Family Finance Flyer Issue 29

Ante Nuptial Agreements and ‘Needs’ post Radmacher

What was abundantly clear from the Supreme Court’s decision in Radmacher v Granatino (see Flyer 24) was that, until Parliament addressed the issue, whatever the wording of an ante-nuptial agreement between the parties, upon distribution on divorce, the ‘needs level’ of either party would continue to be protected under the s 25 statutory exercise.  Click here to read more.